

| INTRODUCTION |
| TO THE TABLES |
| AREA, CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENT |
|
AREA |
| The area figures relate to districts, sub-districts, natural regions, and lakes. |
|
The districts and the sub-districts were defined according to the official administrative division of the State of Israel. According to this division, Israel has six districts, which are divided into 15 sub-districts. |
|
As of ,1967 the area of East Jerusalem has been included in the Jerusalem District. In ,1982 the Golan sub-district was attached to the Northern District. |
|
This chapter also presents data on the natural region areas within each sub-district as well as on the areas of the lakes. |
|
A natural region can be part of one sub-district or, in some cases, an entire sub-district or entire district (see the Map of Israel - Districts, Sub-districts and Natural Regions, 1995). |
|
In the 1995 Census, the system of natural regions was updated and their number increased from 45 (in the 1983 Census) to .50 |
|
The data were received from a computerized measurement of areas conducted by the Computerized Mapping (GIS) Unit of the CBS. |
| Data on the area of East Jerusalem were received from the Ministry of the Interior. |
| CLIMATE |
| Israels climate has unique characteristics. |
|
Israels geographic location, between 290-330 north of the equator, makes it a subtropical region, which is a transitional area between the temperate zone and the tropical zone. Israel, therefore, is on a climatic crossroads: its southern and eastern areas are characterized by an arid climate, while the rest of its areas are characterized by a Mediterranean climate. One of the main traits of this kind of climatic formation is a high degree of variability in the quantities of precipitation from year to year and between different areas. In addition, there is a clear division into two seasons: a hot summer with hardly any rain, and a cool and rainy winter. |
|
The rainy season in Israel usually begins in October and ends in May. Precipitation data are presented for rain years, i.e., from September to August the next year. |
|
Temperature data are presented by calendar years (January to December). Multi-annual averages of temperature refer in most stations to the period from 1964 to .1979 These data were not specified for stations in which measurements were not taken over most of the period or in which considerable changes in the conditions of measurement occurred. |
|
Averages of precipitation quantities were reduced and adjusted to the normal standard period (1961-1990). |
| The multi-annual averages of the number of rainy days refer to the period from 1961 to .1990 |
| Climate data are received from the Meteorological Service in Bet Dagan. |
| NAME OF STATION, GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, AND RELATIVE ALTITUDE |
| COASTAL REGION |
| Haifa, Bay: 35002E; 32051N; 5 m. |
| Even Yizhaq (Galed) 35004E; 32033N; 180 m. |
| Tel Aviv, Sede Dov: 34047E; 32006N; 4 m. |
| Bet Dagan, meteorological station: 34049E; 32000N; 30 m. |
| Negba: 34039E; 31040N; 90 m. |
| HILL REGION AND INLAND VALLEYS |
| Har Kenaan: 35030E; 32058N; 934 m. |
| Ramat Dawid, Qibbuz: 35011E; 32040N; 50 m. |
| Ariel: 35011E; 32006N; 560 m. |
| Jerusalem, Airport: 35013E; 31052N; 757 m. |
| Beer Sheva: 34048E; 31015N; 280 m. |
| JORDAN RIFT AND ARAVA |
| Kefar Blum: 35036E; 33010N; 75 m. |
| Sede Eliyyahu: 35031E; 32026N; -190 m. |
| Elat: 34057E; 29033N; 12 m. |
| ENVIRONMENT |
|
EXPENDITURE FOR PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERVICES |
| (Financial Data) |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Environmental protection services were generally defined according to the guidelines of the statistical offices of the UN and the European Union (EUROSTAT) for classification of activities aimed at protecting the environment. Based on this classification, expenditure for environmental protection included the following items: |
| .1 |
Protection of ambient air and climate. |
| .2 |
Sewage and waste treatment. |
| .3 |
Protection of soil and ground water. |
| .4 |
Noise and vibration abatement. |
| .5 |
Biosphere and landscape protection. |
| .6 |
Protection against radiation. |
| CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE |
|
Expenditure for public environmental protection services was classified according to the implementing sector - the government, government companies, local authorities, and nonprofit institutions. There are five types of public services for environmental protection: |
| .1 |
Treatment of sewage, which includes planning, upkeep, development of sewage and drainage systems, construction and operation of pumping and purification plants, and treatment of rain water. |
| .2 |
Treatment of waste, which includes collection, disposal, and incineration of domestic and industrial waste, treatment of solid refuse and dangerous materials, sweeping of streets, and cleaning of market places. |
| .3 |
Protection of the biosphere, landscape, and atmosphere, which includes construction, maintenance, and beautification of parks, preservation of forests and afforestation, fire fighting, maintenance of beaches and nature reserves, maintenance and reclamation of land, and prevention of air and water pollution. |
| .4 |
General administration, which includes general management as well as planning and supervision related to environmental protection in government ministries, local authorities, and conurbations. |
| .5 |
Other services, which mainly include activities that do not fall within the categories of services specified above. For example: urban planning and construction, and activities of environmental protection units in local authorities. |
| Expenditure for public environmental protection services was classified in the following categories: |
| .1 |
Current expenditure, which includes labor expenses (i.e., imputed government expenditures, which reflects government commitment to pay funded pensions to employees upon retirement), current purchases of commodities, and other services in addition to a calculated estimate of expenditures for depreciation of buildings and equipment. |
| .2 |
Investment in fixed capital, which includes expenses for constructing installations, buildings, other construction projects, and purchase of machinery and equipment for the purpose of environmental protection. |
| AIR |
| EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE |
|
Air pollutants typically include gases added to the atmosphere as a result of human activity. When these gases exceed a certain level of concentration over a given period, they cause damage to the environment and are hazardous to humans. |
|
The pollutants emitted into the atmosphere by human activity are mainly derived from industry (stationary sources) or from motor vehicles (mobile sources). In both cases, pollution is mainly a result of fuel combustion. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Air pollutants include gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) which are emitted into the atmosphere when there is a complete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels (petrol, kerosene, distillate fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas, coal, etc.). Carbon Dioxide is an important greenhouse gas originating from complete combustion of various fuel materials. This pollutant causes climatic changes on earth and global warming. Greenhouse gases endanger the environment of humans and other forms of life - not by poisoning, but rather by global warming (i.e., a greenhouse effect). Air pollutants also include gases emitted into the atmosphere during incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. The most prevalent gases of this type include Carbon monoxide (CO), visible smoke consisting of burnt fuel particles (hydrocarbons) and lead particles. |
|
CO (Carbon monoxide) The absolute standard permitted for a maximum of half an hour is 60 milligram per cubic meter. This pollutant causes headaches, fatigue, dizziness and choking. |
|
Also included in the list of emitted pollutants, to the air are sulfur dioxide (SO2), produced by oxidation of sulfur contained in fuel, nitrogen oxides (NOx), produced by chemical reactions between nitrogen and oxygen in the air during combustion of fuel as well as particles of suspended dust. These were produced by sand storms or human activity such as manufacturing cement, quarrying, etc. |
| SOURCES OF DATA AND METHODS OF CALCULATION |
| Quantities of air pollution emissions are calculated on the basis of: |
| .1 |
Annual quantities of various types of fuel consumed by industry and motor vehicles. Quantities of fuel consumption were obtained from the Energy Division at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| .2 |
Annual kilometrage of the various types of vehicles, by age of vehicle. Data on kilometrage were obtained from the Transportation Division of the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| .3 |
Emission factors of air pollutants from stationary sources (industry) prepared by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) were updated to reflect the conditions in Israel as of .1997 The emission factors were obtained from the air quality division (stationary sources) of the Ministry of the Environment. |
| .4 |
Emission factors of air pollutants from different types of mobile sources (vehicles) according to the age of the vehicle are based on the latest study conducted at the Technion on the topic Evaluation of Emission Factors from Vehicles in Israel (Tartakovski et al., June 1997). These Emission Factors were calculated only for private motor vehicles running on petrol. The emission factors represent average emissions of pollutants from private vehicles traveling in urban and rural areas, at an average speed. Emission factors for other types of vehicles and other fuels were taken from the data of Holland, Britain, and the U.S.A. (AP42). The Emission Factors were obtained from the Air Quality Division (mobile sources) of the Ministry of the Environment. |
| .5 |
Changes in the calculation of CO2: In the past, the emissions were calculated for the Carbon only (C). All of the data from previous year were multiplied by .3.666 As a result, data on emissions now refer to CO2. This change was introduced in order to facilitate comparison with emission values from Europe and the United States. |
|
The data were processed and the model was designed at the Central Bureau of Statistics in full cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment. The database, which includes information mentioned in sections ,1-4 has been constructed and is available at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
| .1 |
The data do not refer to all air pollutants emitted into the atmosphere, and include only those emitted due to combustion of fuels. Nor do the data include quantities of greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere in other ways, e.g., as a result of natural processes or as a result of human activities other than fuel combustion. It should be noted, however, that a large part of air pollution is caused by fuel combustion. |
| .2 |
Some of the emission factors were derived from Europe or the United States and are not completely adapted to the conditions in Israel. |
| CONCENTRATIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Concentrations of air pollutants measured in Israel are divided into gases proven to be poisonous to humans (e.g., Sulfur Oxides - SOx) or greenhouse gases that do not have a direct impact on humans, but contribute toward global warming. There are also pollutants that are not emitted as a direct result of human activity, but as a secondary result of human activity. For example, Ozone derives from chemical reactions between (manmade) hydrocarbons, Nitrogen Oxides (also from human emissions), and solar radiation. In addition, concentrations of suspended particulate matter in the air (SPM) were measured. SPM concentrations can be created by human activity as cement manufacturing or quarrying, or by natural occurrences such as sandstorms. |
| STATISTICAL STANDARD |
|
There are regulations for permissible concentrations of air pollutants, known as air quality standards (1992). |
| .1 |
Statistical standard (or a standard of 99.75%). This standard applies to the pollutant Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and defines the maximum permitted concentration of a pollutant 99.75% of the time. |
| .2 |
Absolute standard (or a standard of 100%). This standard applies to all pollutants and defines the maximum concentration of a pollutant permitted at all times. |
| POLLUTANTS |
|
SOx (Sulfur Oxides). Vehicles mainly emit these pollutants. The absolute standard permitted for 24 hours is 280 micrograms per cubic meter of air. SOx can cause respiratory difficulties, acid rain, and direct damage to plants. It is also a corrosive gas, which acts on steel. |
|
NOx (Nitrogen Oxides): Gaseous compounds consisting of nitrogen and oxygen. The absolute standard permitted for half an hour is 940 micrograms per cubic meter. The pollutant can cause respiratory difficulties and increase the incidence of respiratory tract diseases as well damaging plant life, and acid rain. |
|
O3: This gas is produced by chemical reactions between hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and solar radiation. The absolute standard permitted for a maximum of half an hour is 230 micrograms per cubic meter. The standard for eight hours is 160 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The pollutant can cause irritation in the respiratory system and damage plant life. |
|
SPM (Suspended Particulate Matter): These particles are derived from natural sources such as sandstorms, or from manmade sources such as particles from quarrys, the cement industry, etc. The standard for three hours is 300 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The daily standard (for 24 hours) is 200 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Currently, a distinction is made between general particles (SPM) and particles that can be inhaled (PM10) - which are 10 microns or less in size. These particles may cause irritation of the respiratory system. The daily standard (for 24 hours) is 150 micrograms per cubic meter of air, and the yearly standard is 60 micrograms per cubic meter of |
| air. |
| SOURCES AND METHODS OF CALCULATION |
|
The source of this data is the network of monitoring stations in conurbations, local authorities, a national network for monitoring environmental quality (NMN), and the Israel Electric Corporation. These stations use appropriate instruments to measure concentrations of air pollutants. Not all of the monitoring stations are mentioned in the table. Rather, representative monitoring stations were selected for various types of environments: residential suburbs, commercial centers, industrial areas, etc. |
|
Data were obtained from the Ministry of the Environment, based on records received at the stations every five minutes. Means were calculated per half-hour, per day, and per annum. |
| Maximum value for 24 hours: The maximum daily value recorded during the year. |
| Maximum half-hour value: The maximum half-hour value recorded during the year. |
| Anomalies: number of records exceding the standards during the year. |
|
As of ,1998 the table also includes monitoring stations for motor vehicles, which are located next to major highways. Measurements were taken at an altitude of three meters above the road. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
| .1 |
The data do not refer to all air pollutants that endanger plant and animal life and do not include greenhouse gases. |
| .2 |
The tables display data on concentrations of pollutants from only a few monitoring stations in Israel. Data from the rest of the stations is available at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| .3 |
Not all of the stations measure all of the pollutants. Therefore, there may be missing data at certain stations. |
| .4 |
Some of the monitoring stations operated only partially during certain periods. Data from monitoring stations that operated less than 35% of the time is presented in parentheses and should be considered with reservation. |
| WATER |
| WATER CONSUMPTION |
|
For data on water consumption according to sources and various uses, see chapter on Energy and Water. |
| QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER |
|
The data presented in this section refer solely to the microbiological and chemical quality of drinking water, by test results prepared by the Ministry of Health and the Meqorot Company. |
|
Microbiological analyses of potable water (i.e., drinking water) produced by the Meqorot Company are usually conducted outside of localities at water sources and supply lines of the company, before consumers are connected to the supply. Microbiological analyses of water sources controlled by localities and within the local supply lines are conducted by the local authorities under the supervision of the Ministry of Health. |
|
Chemical analyses of water sources are mainly conducted by the Meqorot Company. As of ,1998 chemical analyses of private water sources in localities have also been conducted at the laboratories of the Ministry of Health or at private laboratories recognized by the Ministry of Health, and their results have been published. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Microbiological Analysis: A test to reveal coliform bacteria. The Ministry of Health conducts the analysis in the water distribution networks (pipes and reservoirs). With regard to water sources (surface and ground water), a complete microbiological analysis is carried out, which includes the above mentioned test as well as tests of enterococcus bacteria, faecal coliforms and a general count of bacteria. The Meqorot Company carries out a complete microbiological test. |
|
Regulations: (Ordinance for Health of the Population (Health Quality of Drinking Water), ,1974 amended in 1988). The regulations for determining the quality of water define, inter alia, the type of bacteria and their concentrations in potable water, as well as the sampling and testing methods, the frequency of tests, and the responsible bodies. |
|
According to the regulations, water is undrinkable if samples in a microbiological test reveal over 3 coliform bacteria per 100 ml of water. Samples with up to 3 coliform bacteria also require testing for faecal coliform. There is no obligation to repeat the tests if the appropriate measures are taken to improve the water quality according to the test results. |
|
Microbiological analyses with sub-standard results: Microbiological tests of water samples in which the proportion of bacteria is found to exceed the level permitted in the regulations. |
|
The percent of analyses with sub-standard results: This is an indicator of the waters microbiological quality. It does not always reveal the proportion of water rejected for drinking in any given region, owing to limitations in sampling and testing procedures. |
|
Chemical analysis: Intended for early detection of changes in the chemical composition of drinking water sources, where the quantity of components may indicate pollution as defined by the regulations. Until ,1996 the company conducted the following chemical analyses: |
| .1 |
Limited analyses - conducted every three months at all active water sources connected to the drinking water supply. These analyses are intended to detect the following components in the water: chlorides, detergents, and nitric compounds. |
| .2 |
Partial analyses - conducted every five years at all active sources of drinking water, where the following components are measured: iron, nitrate, sulfate, chloride, magnesium, sodium, potassium, fluoride, mineral oil, and calcium as well as hardness, color, and turbidity - in accordance with the regulations. |
| .3 |
Complete analyses - conducted every 10 years, where all of the chemical components are examined as in the partial analyses. In addition, analyses for radioactivity, heavy metals, and other components are conducted. |
| Since ,1997 the chemical analyses are conducted, in accordance with the new regulations, on the basis of the component and not in conformity with the sampling group. Consequently, in the chemical analysis table, the number of samples is much larger than in previous years. Since ,1997 samples are counted according to components. |
|
Chemical analyses revealing sub-standard results: Chemical analyses of water samples in which chemical components exceed the levels permitted in the regulations. For example: the maximum permitted level of chlorides is 600 milligram per liter of water; nitrates - 90 milligram per liter of water; and iron - 1,000 micrograms per liter of water. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
| .1 |
Some of the sub-standard results revealed in the analyses may not be attributed to the water pollution itself, but to failure to conform to the sampling regulations (e.g., conditions for delivery to the laboratory, conditions for implementation of the analysis, and false positive results). Some of these cases are revealed at the time when the analyses are repeated. |
| .2 |
The more analyses conducted, the greater the likelihood of obtaining sub-standard results. This percent does not necessarily reflect the percent of non-potable water in the total amount of water supplied. Apparently, in small localities which are found to have more pollution, more analyses are conducted (in relation to the quantity of the water supplied) than in large localities. Thus, the Meqorot Company often conducts analyses more frequently in suspicious locations (points-at-risk). |
| .3 |
The percent of sub-standard microbiological test results refers only to routine and repeated tests, and not to special tests conducted as a result of pollution in the system. |
| .4 |
Data on microbiological and chemical analyses performed by Meqorot indicate the quality of the water in the water sources (surface and ground water) and in the water networks (pipes and reservoirs), and do not indicate the quality of water supplied to consumers. Before water is supplied to consumers, it receives various types of treatments in order to become potable. |
| .5 |
It should be noted that the sub-standard test results obtained by the Meqorot Company, were calculated on the basis of the new regulations, which are stricter than the earlier ones and have not yet been approved. In contrast, sub-standard test results obtained by the Ministry of Health (using samples taken from local authorities) were based on the previous regulations. |
|
For further information on quality of drinking water, definitions, and data sources, see Quality of Drinking Water in Israel: 1988-1992, published in the supplement to the Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, No. ,11 .1993 |
| WATER LEVEL IN AQUIFERS |
|
The aquifers in Israel are: Aquifer Hof, Aquifer Yarqon Taninim (Yarqtan), Western Galilee Aquifer, Carmel Aquifer, Kinneret Aquifer, Eastern Hill Aquifer, Negev and Arava Aquifer. In ,1997/98 nearly 2050 million cubic meters of water were produced by the aquifers. About 1,230 million cubic meters were pumped from wells, and the rest flowed from springs. Two-thirds of all pumping in 1997/98 (819 million cubic meters) were produced from the Hof and Yarqon-Taninim aquifers, which are connected with the national system (according to the Report of the Hydrological Service, 1999). |
| PRESENTATION OF DATA |
|
The information in the tables focuses on the two major aquifers, in terms of the overall amount of water pumped through wells: Aquifer Hof, and Aquifer Yarqon Taninim. The tables present specific data on a limited number of wells (out of hundreds), in accordance with the recommendations of the Hydrological Service in Israel. |
|
The variables published for the wells are the water level in relation to Mean Sea Level (MSL), during two typical months. In addition, the data indicate the height of the drilling point above MSL, in order to provide an idea of the depth of the drilling that must be carried out when water is pumped. |
|
The typical months for which water level values were published in relation to MSL were: May (Spring), which provides an estimate of the largest amount of water (maximal water level), and November (Fall), which indicates the lowest level of the aquifer (minimal water level). |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Amount of water: Amount of water pumped, amount of water flowing from springs, through recovery or refilling of water to aquifers. Data are presented in units of million cubic meters (MCM) per annum. |
|
Water salinity: One of the most important parameters in distribution of water based on quality is the concentration of chlorides measured by milligrams of chlorides per liter. Water salinity is measured according to the level of chlorides. |
|
Brackish water (in contrast to saline water) can be used in ponds or for differential irrigation (of specific crops). |
| Water with 400 to 600 mg/liter of chloride is defined as brackish. |
|
Water pollution: Another parameter of water quality is the concentration of nitrogen per liter of water (mg/l nitrogen). The quality of water in various drillings (several hundred throughout Israel) is usually categorized as follows: |
|
Good quality water: Concentration of chlorides below 250 mg/l, and concentration of nitrogen below 45 mg/l. |
|
Satisfactory water quality: Concentration of chlorides between 250 and 600 mg/l of chloride, and concentration of nitrogen below 70 mg/l. |
|
Low water quality: Concentration of chlorides exceeding 600 mg/l, or concentration of nitrogen exceeding 70 mg/l. |
|
Hydrological year: Summary of hydrological data for the year beginning in October and ending in September of the following calendar year (rather than from January to the end of December, as is customary in other calendars). |
| DESCRIPTION OF AQUIFERS |
|
Aquifer Hof Coastal aquifer: The aquifer spans from Binyamina in the north to Nir Am in the south. The total area of the aquifer is 1,900 square kilometers. In certain sections, it also touches the Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer. Therefore, it is possible to transfer water from one aquifer to the other. In the west, the aquifer is right next to the sea, which enables water to flow from the aquifer into the sea, and vice versa. The aquifer receives water from precipitation, as well as from recharging (see section on wastewater and treated wastewater below), and from leakage from water consumption systems, irrigation, and sewage and drainage above the surface. |
|
The Hof Aquifer produces about 400 million cubic meters of water per annum from pumping and drilling. This constitutes over one-fifth of the overall national product. Of this amount, about 11 million cubic meters per annum are brackish water. In addition, the aquifer is a reservoir of water from the National Water Carrier in years of abundant rain. |
|
Seline and polluted water from agricultural irrigation flows back to the aquifer, polluting ground water with fertilizers and pesticides. Additional pollution of aquifer water derives from industrial waste, oil lines, and human activity. The Dan Region Reclamation Project recharges effluents into the aquifer, which are pumped to the southern region of Israel for irrigation after an appropriate period. |
|
Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer: The aquifer extends along the ridge of the hills of Judea and Samaria in the east and the Mediterranean coast on the west. To the north, the aquifer is bordered by the southern slopes of the Carmel and Nahal Taninim. To the south, it is bordered by the Beer Sheva Valley. |
|
In the coastal region (the western part of the aquifer), the Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer is underneath the Hof Aquifer. The aquifers are usually divided by opaque rocks, except for points where they connect, and where it is possible for water to transfer from one aquifer to another. |
| About 370 million cubic meters of water are pumped from the aquifer per annum. |
| Of this amount, about 4 million cubic meters of water are brackish. |
| The aquifer has three salinity areas: |
|
The salt sources of the Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer are Aynot Hataninim (which has a high level of salinity from rain water). In addition, sea water and timlachot recharged into the aquifer cause a high level of salinity. The amount of water recharged from the National Water Carrier into the aquifer is minimal compared with the amount of water pumped. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
There are hundreds of wells in the seven aquifers. Each aquifer has been examined, and there are detailed reports at Israels Hydrological Service. The table only presents data for the two main aquifers in Israel in terms of the amount of water pumped. For each aquifer, only a small amount of the wells are presented. |
| Four wells were chosen to represent the Hof Aquifer: |
|
Observation wells at Beit Shiqma ,6/3 Holon ,27/1 Gelil Yam ,36/2 Hadera B.2/53 Observation wells do not require pumping. Therefore, the water levels measured are more reliable than those derived from active pumping. |
| The minimal height for pumping at Aquifer Hof is sea level (0 meters). |
|
Three wells were chosen to represent the Yarqon-Taninim Aquifer, upon the recommendation of the Hydrological Service of Israel: Observation drilling in Beer Sheva (by Meqorot), private and oil drilling in Petah Tiqwa, and exploratory drilling at Menashe T.1 |
|
The exploratory drilling at Menashe T-1 constituted an absolute minimum level. The red-line water level was 9 meters above sea level. |
|
Exploratory drilling occurs at a narrow diameter, without pumping. Therefore, the water level is more reliable than in drillings that involve active pumping. If there is no way of measuring the water level during a certain month, there are methods of interpolation and imputation of data from neighboring drillings. Of course, a hydrological model is used to complete the data. This adjustment is carried out in only a small percent of all measurements. Measurements are carried out on the basis of the new Geodetic Grid of Israel. |
| SOURCES OF DATA |
|
The Hydrological Service of Israel provided raw data (number of water level measurements and the exact date they were taken every month of the year), as well as data on the height of the drilling points above sea level. |
|
The staff of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics thank the Hydrological Service of Israel for their professional guidance in preparing the new series on the water level of aquifers in Israel. |
|
Statistical processing of the raw data has been carried out at the Central Bureau of Statistics, Environment and Natural Resources Statistics Department. |
| LAKE WATER |
| WATER LEVEL FOR LAKE KINNERET AND THE DEAD SEA, SALINITY OF LAKE KINNERET |
|
The Hydrological Survey of Israel measures and reports on the water balance and salinity in aquifers, water at Lake Kinneret, water at the Dead Sea, and spring water. |
|
The table on the water level of the lakes (in meters, by height above sea level) presents seasonal data from the 1920s for the Sea of Galilee and from the 1970s for the Dead Sea. For Lake Kinneret, the average salinity for each year of measurement was calculated. |
|
Water from Lake Kinneret is used for drinking water, which is piped to consumers (after treatment) by the National Water Carrier. Therefore, information on the water level of Lake Kinneret is essential, and indicates the water reserves existing in the country. Channeling of water to the National Water Carrier (rather than to the Jordan river) has a strong impact on the water of the Dead Sea. It is also important to measure the water level of the Dead Sea, due to the diversion of water to the Our Canal in Jordan as well as to reservoirs in Syria and Lebanon. |
|
Information on the water level of lakes in these seasonal series may provide an indication of short-term as well as long-term problems. These series constitute a basis for understanding the physical processes and environmental changes caused by human intervention in the ecosystem. In addition, the seasonal series provide important information on natural fluctuations in availability of water. |
| PRESENTATION OF DATA |
|
Lake Kinneret and the Dead Sea are both bodies of water located below sea level on the Syrian-African Rift. Several water level measurements are carried out regularly, on a monthly basis. There are raw series containing all of the measurements and dates of sampling. The values presented for water level data of the two lakes are in meters. All of the values appear with a minus sign, since the lakes are below sea level. |
|
The Hydrological Service recommended presenting the May and November measurements for Lake Kinneret, and May and December measurements for the Dead Sea. |
|
The Spring months (April, May) are natural estimates of the maximum water level for a given year, whereas the Fall months (November-December) are estimates of the minimal water level (after the dry season, when there is no rainfall). |
| It is important to provide reports on chloride content, since the amount of chlorides in water is |
| indicative of salinity, whereas the presence of nitrogen in water is indicative of pollution. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Dead Sea: A saline lake, the lowest in the world, which does not belong to a reservoir of drinking water (or water for irrigation). The environmental interest in the Dead Sea aims to measure indirect effects of activity in the drainage area, which runs through four countries (Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon) and the changes that have taken place following human intervention in natural processes. In addition, this saline lake is an important economic resource (for tourism and industry), and the changes there should be followed. |
|
Lake Kinneret: The largest fresh water lake in Israel. Environmental interest in Lake Kinneret derives from the fact that it is the potential reservoir of drinking water in the country. Therefore, the water level of the lake is of considerable importance to the country. |
| Salinity (expressed by measures of chlorides in milligrams per liter (mg/l)). |
| Water with 400 to 600 mg of chlorides is defined as brackish. |
| Water with over 600 mg of chlorides is defined as saline, and is considered low quality. |
| There is still no standard for lake water quality in Israel. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
If no measure was taken during a certain month, hydrologists at the Hydrological Survey of Israel use nearest neighbor imputation methods or other accepted models to fill in the missing data. These models take into account seasonal and hydrological information that has accumulated over the years. Today, the water level of Lake Kinneret is measured regularly and updated every 15 minutes. |
| SOURCES OF THE DATA |
|
Raw data from water level and salinity measurements of Lake Kinneret and water level measurements of the Dead Sea were obtained from the Hydrological Service of Israel. Water level measurements of the Dead Sea taken from 1977 to the end of 1990 were obtained from the Institute for Earth Science Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The values obtained from the two institutions were measured at the same geodetic grid the New Israel Grid. |
|
Processing and preparation for publication were conducted at the Department of Environmental Statistics at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| SEAS AND BEACHES |
| QUALITY OF SEA WATER AT BEACHES |
|
The Mediterranean Coast is 188 kilometers long. Other beaches are located at Lake Kinneret, the Dead Sea, and the Red Sea. The number of stations at official beaches is ,112 ,28 ,17 and ,4 respectively. The total number of official beaches in 1998 was .161 An official beach is one with a lifeguard, which has been recognized as appropriate for the public to bathe in (there must be a lifeguards post and a flagpole). |
|
Along the coast there are sections declared by the Ministry of the Interior as public beaches, but which are closed for bathing due to health hazards. |
|
Most sea water pollution comes from the land. The farther the source of pollution is from the sea, the cleaner the sea water. |
| STANDARD FOR WATER QUALITY AT DECLARED BEACHES |
| The Ministry of health follows the MEDPOL Accords for preservation of the Mediterranean Sea. |
|
The Ministry of Health (Public Health Department) has published a standard for water quality at declared beaches. Permits to open beaches to the public are subject to every aspect of this standard. |
| There are five criteria for forbidding public use of a beach: |
|
|
Epidemiological and logical evidence of infectious diseases associated with bathing at that beach. |
|
|
Presence of a source of wastewater or treated wastewater near the beach. |
|
|
Discovery of emitted particles at the beach or in the sea water. |
|
|
Presence of factors which the Ministry of Health believes are hazardous to public health. |
|
|
The sea water does not meet the numerical standards of laboratory tests. |
|
The first four criteria are difficult to enforce, since there is no definition of the events that lead to closure of a public beach. The last criterion allows for statistical followup of sea water quality. |
| SEA WATER SAMPLING STANDARDS, TESTING, AND RESULTS |
|
Frequency of samples: During bathing season (from May to October), at least one sample per week. During the Winter (from November to April) one sample per month, at every declared beach. If the beach also operates during the Winter, it will be tested according to Summer standards. |
| Type of testing: Counting faecal coliforms per 100 ml of sea water. |
| NUMERICAL STANDARD: |
|
|
The geometric average of sea water tests from the beach during the bathing season shall not exceed 200 faecal coliforms per 100 ml of sea water. |
|
|
Results of individual tests shall not exceed 400 faecal coliforms per 100 ml of sea water in over 20% of the samples. |
|
There are 26 weeks in a season. Accordingly, there cannot be more than five individual tests with a coliform count exceeding .400 Every beach must have at least 32 tests per year. |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA |
|
The data include 4,368 laboratory tests for 147 beaches on the Mediterranean coast, Lake Kinneret, and the Red Sea. |
|
In the northern region, 669 tests were carried out at 31 beaches; in the Haifa district, 1,054 tests were taken at 18 beaches; in the central region, 777 tests were taken at 42 beaches; in the Tel Aviv region, 938 tests were taken at 23 beaches; and in the southern district, 930 tests were taken from 33 beaches. |
|
Only one beach, the Hof Hayarok beach, exceeded the minimum standard by over .20% The beach was closed to the public. |
|
Regarding the raw material, every record contains the following information: Name of the local authority where the beach is located; mark of the beach; name of the beach; date of test; number of faecal coliforms counted in the lab. |
|
The table Microbiological Sample Tests from Sea Water at Beaches, by District and Sub-district presents distribution of tests at a number of beaches, by groups of faecal coliforms. Only beaches with at least one irregularity (<400) during the bathing season appear in the table. The rest of the beaches are included in the summaries of the sub-districts and districts. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
The percent of irregularities among the samples with over 400 faecal coliforms per 100 liter was calculated on the basis of the number of samples and not just on the basis of samples taken during the bathing season. |
| SOURCE OF THE DATA |
|
The raw data were obtained from the Ministry of Health, laboratory department. The public health laboratories in Haifa, Tel Aviv, and Beer Sheva took the water samples and carried out the tests. |
|
The material was processed and analyzed at the Central Bureau of Statistics, Environment and Natural Resources Statistics Department. |
| WASTEWATER AND TREATED WASTEWATER |
|
Wastewater is the inevitable result of water use. Much of the wastewater in Israel is treated in installations and then flows back to the environment for use in agricultural irrigation and industry. In some cases, it is recharged into ground water. |
| TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER |
|
Treatment of wastewater using the advanced technology of activated sludge began in Haifa in the early 1970s. The treatment plant for wastewater from the Dan Region Reclamation Project (known as Shafdan) began operating in the early 1980s. |
|
The Water Commission has been conducting surveys of collection, treatment, and reuse of wastewater since .1963 The latest survey was published in ,1994 and the summary tables for the survey appear in the Statistical Abstracts of the Central Bureau of Statistics, .1995-1997 |
| SURVEY OF TREATMENT PLANTS |
|
The Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of National Infrastructures are conducting a survey under the auspices of the Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority. The survey deals with treatment plants (which use advanced technology, without domestic recharging pits). The sample used in 1998 encompassed 55 treatment plants, which cover about 80% of all wastewater in the country. Most of the sewage content (over 99 percent) was water, and the rest was waste. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
The objective of treating raw sewage (RS, waste water, and influents) is to separate and break down the components of pollution from water. If the treatment process is effective, water can be reclaimed for industry and agriculture. Treated wastewater can also be used for rehabilitation of streams. These processes should be as natural as possible, and should not be hazardous to the environment. |
| The main processes implemented for treatment of wastewater are as follows: |
| .1 |
Mechanical Treatment (Preliminary Treatment) |
| Mechanical treatment removes solids from the sewage. |
|
| .2 |
Sedimentation ponds preliminary sedimentation |
| Sedimentation of pollutants can be natural, but may also be catalyzed by chemical materials. |
|
| .3 |
Biological Treatment (Secondary Treatment) |
| Oxidation Ponds |
|
| Ponds where biological breakdown of sewage pollutants takes place, through algae and bacteria without using mechanical means for aeration. |
|
| Aerated Lagoons |
|
| Ponds where biological breakdown takes place through bacteria, using mechanical tools for aeration. |
|
| Polishing Ponds |
|
| Following biological treatment, the sewage remains in the ponds in order to improve the quality of the water. |
|
| Activated Sludge |
|
| |
Growth of bacteria that feed on organic matter and reduce organic water pollution. |
| The secondary sludge that consists of all of the bacteria that fed on organic pollution in the water is used again as an active substance in the process of treating sewage. It forms a bed of active bacteria that multiply and concomitantly eliminate the pollution. This process is therefore called activated sludge, since the sludge is reactivated and returned to the treatment process. |
|
| Water free of organic pollution is referred to as effluents or treated water, and is recycled for human use and activity. |
|
| .4 |
Method of Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) only in Shafdan |
| All of the advanced technologies are used on raw sewage. The sewage is subject to biological treatment in oxidation ponds, and polishing ponds. Treated wastewater recharged into the aquifer through recharging fields is referred to as Recharged Effluents (RE). The flow of treated water to the aquifer is monitored. The water flows to the point where the water collects underground and continues to be purified. After a certain period (about a year), the water is pumped from wells. This water, known as Reclaimed Water (RW), is used for agricultural irrigation. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
The following variables are presented in the table Amount of Raw Sewage and Quality of Effluents from Treatment Plants, by District and Sub-district: |
| a. |
Geographic location, number of observations, and quantity of sewage |
| The quantity of raw sewage is measured in Million Cubic Meters (MCM). |
|
| b. |
Quality of effluents |
| All of the units are in milligrams per liter of water, unless otherwise specified. |
|
BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand)) refers to the amount of dissolved oxygen consumed by organisms for aerobic decomposition of organic matter. This variable is usually measured at a temperature of 20ºC. |
| Suspended Solids |
|
EC (Electrical Conductivity) is an indicator of water salinity (in addition to chloride concentration). The unit of measurement is micro-mhos per centimeter ((mho/cm). |
| DO (Dissolved Oxygen) is measured in percents. |
|
Chlorides: Indicate the salinity of water. If the water contains a concentration of over 600 mg/L of chlorides, it is considered saline. (There are crops such as avocado, that cannot be irrigated with water that has 200 mg/l of chlorides or more). |
| Phosphorous is mainly taken from wastewater for fertilizer. |
| Boron is mainly taken from wastewater for laundry detergent. |
| The quality of treated wastewater is determined according to chemical and physical parameters. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
In ,1998 55 treatment plants were surveyed that use the above-mentioned methods 1-4 to treat wastewater. The CBS combined data from treatment plants where the amount of raw sewage per annum was less than 2 million cubic meters. Out of the 55 plants sampled, 19 fell into this category. The largest plants that use advanced technologies were chosen. The fact that some small plants using modern technologies were not included in the sample was not corrected. The researchers assume that the sample covers about 80% of the raw sewage flowing to modern plants. |
|
The number of observations (n) measured in all of the sewage treatment plants during the course of one year to evaluate quality of effluents ranges from 1 to .3 This does not provide a sufficient basis for drawing conclusions or statistical processing. For lack of another source of data on quality of effluents, the table presents estimates that are not statistically significant and the report primarily gives a general picture of the situation. |
| Estimates of the Amount of Sewage in the Country |
|
In the sewage treatment plants are included only factories that use modern technology to treat 342 million cubic meters of raw sewage in .1998 |
|
The Ministry of the Environment (Department of Water and Streams) estimates that about 76 million cubic meters of sewage is treated in Septic tanks or channeled into the sea and streams. Of this sewage, about 42 million cubic meters of sewage is channeled to streams. The only national estimate available to the CBS is the total of these two estimates (i.e,. 418 million cubic meters). |
|
Dan Regional Plant For reclamation of sewage from the Dan Region and recharging urban effluents to ground water |
|
The Dan Region Plant treats raw sewage from the Dan Region, which includes some of the localities in the Tel Aviv district, and some localities from the Central district. The large cities that channel raw sewage into the Dan Region Plant are: Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, Givatayim, Benei Brak, Bat-Yam, Holon (Tel Aviv District), Petah Tiqwa, Rishon LeZiyyon (Central District), and nine smaller localities. |
|
The amount of raw sewage treated at the Dan Region Plant constitutes about 30% of the total amount of sewage treated at all of the plants in Israel. |
|
The table Quality of Waste Water, Effluents, and Reclaimed Water in the Dan Region Unit indicates the chemical, biological, and physical parameters for measuring quality of effluents in .1997 Measures are taken daily and a large number of observations are carried out. |
|
The (average) measured parameters selected to represent the quality of effluents were those that had been recommended by the Ministry of National Infrastructures, Meqorot, the Dan Region Unit, and comparison with reports characterizing European countries and the United States. |
|
The table Yearly Amount of Wastewater, Effluents, and Reclaimed Water from the Dan Region Reclamation Project provides seasonal data on yearly amounts of raw sewage and effluents as of ,1977 including an estimate of seepage of effluents from oxidation and polishing ponds. |
|
Since ,1977 the Dan Region Reclamation Project has been treating tertiary effluents by recharging the treated water into ground water. |
|
In ,1987 the Mechanical Biological Treatment Plant (MBTP) (phase 2) began operation. As of that year, MBTP has also channeled effluents into the sea. |
|
The table presents amounts of effluents recharged into ground water, as well as amounts of Reclaimed Water (RW). |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS FOR THE DAN REGION RECLAMATION PROJECT |
|
A list of basic parameters is provided for waste water and quality of effluents. Scores of other variables are measured at the project. Only a few variables were selected for presentation, based on ranks provided by professionals from Meqorot, the Dan Region Reclamation Project, and the Water Commission. The selected variables were compared with data published in European statistical yearbooks. |
|
The measurement units were usually milligrams per liter (mg/l), and sometimes milligrams per 100 milliliters (mg/100ml) or micrograms per liter ((g/l) (e.g,. Phenol and Boron). |
|
For variables that involve counting, the Most Probable Number (MPN) was the statistical method used to determine that value. |
|
Entroviruses: Laboratory measurement of viruses can only be conducted on cell cultures (since viruses are parasites within cells). The number of viruses is measured by the Plaque Forming Units (PFU), which determines the toxicity of water based on the size of the virus culture. |
| Electrical Conductivity (EC) is an indicator of water salinity (in addition to chloride concentration). |
| The unit of measurement is micromhos per centimeter ((mho / cm). |
|
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) is highly dependent on the extent to which industrial and domestic waste are diluted, and the general volume of waste. The SAR is calculated by dividing the concentration of nitrate in the water by the square root of half the concentration of Calcium + Magnesium (per liter of water). |
|
|
|
Definitions and Explanations to the Table Yearly Amount of Raw Wastewater, Effluents, and Reclaimed Water |
|
|
The ratio of reclaimed water (RW) and raw sewage (RS) was calculated (in percents). |
|
|
The rate of change in amounts of reclaimed water was calculated (in percents), from year t to year t-.1 |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
The laboratory data in the table that presents the quality of effluents from treatment plants throughout the country were obtained from a very small number of observations. Nonetheless, the statistic on amount of raw sewage was obtained from a source other than the laboratory measures, and the statistical validity limitation does not hold for it. |
|
|
The amount of raw sewage for the Dan Region Reclamation Project in ,1998 according to the project data measuring the sewage received, was 112.3 million cubic meters. |
|
|
The estimated amount of raw sewage for the Dan Region Reclamation Project in ,1998 according to the estimate of the Ministry of the Environment, was 112.3 million cubic meters. |
|
|
The estimated amount of raw sewage for the Dan Region Reclamation Project in 1998 based on a telephone survey of conurbations that channeled raw sewage into the project in 1998 was 127 million cubic meters. |
|
The differences between the estimates of raw sewage flowing into the Dan Region Reclamation Project, according to various sources, range from .10-20% |
| SOURCES OF DATA |
|
The data on quality of effluents in treatment plants throughout the country were obtained from the Natural Reserves and National Parks Authority, which implements the survey for the Ministry of the Environment and the Water Commission. |
|
Data on amounts of raw sewage for 55 treatment plants sampled in the survey were obtained directly from the Ministry of the Environment. |
|
The data in the tables on quality and quantity of waste water and effluents in the Dan Region Reclamation Project were obtained from the project plant (operated by the Meqorot Company). |
|
The laboratory measures for reclaimed water (RecW) in the parameters of quality were analyzed and reported by the head of Meqorot and not by the Dan Region Project Unit. |
|
Analysis, processing, and preparation of material for publication was carried out by the Central Bureau of Statistics, Department for Environmental Statistics. |
| STREAM WATER |
|
This section presents data on 10 major streams in Israel, based on the decision of the Nature Reserves Authority as well as data on the Yarqon River provided by the Yarqon River Authority (a total of 11 rivers). |
|
The table refers to the chemical and biological quality of the stream water based on measurements taken by the Nature Reserves Authority and the Yarqon River Authority. |
|
To date there is no broad-based standard for assessing the quality of stream water. Thus, every stream has its own conditions - both in terms of water flowing to the stream (e.g., treated effluents, untreated waste water, sea water, etc.), as well as in terms of the streams sources (e.g., natural springs, affluence of water), and in terms of animal life (e.g., with fish, without fish). Consequently, each stream is discussed separately, without general reference to all streams in Israel. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
The quality of stream water depends on numerous factors - waste flowing to the stream, pumping from stream sources, erosion from polluted areas, etc. There are two types of measurements: chemical and biological. |
| Chemical Quality |
| The chemical quality of stream water is represented by: |
|
Tests providing information on salinity of water and presence of poisons, as well as tests of electrical conductivity (EC). Values of conductivity exceeding 5 millimho per centimeter indicate saline water. Chloride (Cl) is also a measure of salinity. According to international standards, 250 milligrams of chlorides per liter (mg/L) is the upper limit for sweet water. In Israel, owing to the quality of the water, the standard is higher (upper limit for sweet water is 600 mg/L). Boron (B) is extremely toxic for plants even in low concentrations. Consumption of chemical oxygen (COD) measures the quantities of hydrocarbons in water (including those that are not easily dissolved). These substances serve as good indicators of the impact of wastewater and pollution on stream water. |
| Biological Quality |
|
In order to obtain a complete picture of the state of the streams, biological measures are also necessary. To date, biological indicators are not tested, although measuring Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) assesses the rate of biological activity. |
|
The biological oxygen demand is important because of the conditions that accompany it, i.e., consumption of oxygen as a result of a high concentration of organic matter and of a large amount of nutrients in the water. A high bioproduction can cause temporary or permanent lack of oxygen (anaerobic conditions). An example of temporary anaerobic conditions is due to growth of algae characterized by intensified production of oxygen during the day and intensified oxygen demand during the night. |
|
The oxygen condition in the stream is measured by the oxygen saturation of water. This measurement indicates the percent of saturation (in relation to the temperature and elevation above sea level) of the stream. Excess oxygen is indicative of intensified photosynthetic activity (numerous algae) which is caused by an excess of organic material in the water (deriving from sources such as sewage water and organic fertilizers). Lack of oxygen may indicate excessive utilization of oxygen by bacteria due to water pollution. Oxygen saturation of less than 20% poses respiratory problems for fish. |
| General Quality |
|
Other parameters for measuring general water quality, which are not chemical or biological are physical or calculated measurements. These measurements include Total Suspended Solids (TSS) which derive from various sources such as sewage, industrial activity, or natural sources (soil erosion, etc.). An example of a calculated measurement is the mark (for a detailed explanation, see the section on quality indicators below). |
| Quality Indicators |
|
In order to evaluate the general quality of the water, a calculated measure was designed using a scale of marks for ranking the quality of the water, based on the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in milligrams of oxygen per liter. |
| BOD Values (mg/L) |
Type of water |
Representative Mark |
| BOD5 |
Natural water |
1 |
| 5<BOD20 |
Water enriched by organic material |
2 |
| 20<BOD150 |
Polluted water |
3 |
| BOD>150 |
Untreated sewage |
4 |
|
Another measure of water salinity is based on the variable of chloride (Cl) concentration, measured in milligrams of chloride per liter (mg/L). |
| CI VALUE (mg/L) |
Description of Water |
| CI600 |
Fresh Water |
| 600<Cl4000 |
Brackish Water |
| Cl>4000 |
Saline Water |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
| .1 |
The data do not cover all of the streams, but only applies to 11 major rivers selected by the Nature Reserves Authority and the Yarqon River Authority. Regarding other streams, which do not appear in the table, complete data is available at the Central Bureau of Statistics, including comparative data with other countries. |
| .2 |
The data do not cover all of the pollutants or all of the tests conducted in the field. Thus, the most representative data were selected in terms of their impact on plant and animal life in the stream. Nonetheless, this information can serve as an indicator of the general state of the stream. Additional measures and results of other tests are available at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| .3 |
Some of the stations along the stream were sampled only once a year. Hence the minimum and maximum measurements are equal. |
| .4 |
Data on the Yarqon River represent measurements for two years - 1996 and .1997 and not only for the year ,1997 as in all other streams. This change was required, since only one measurement was conducted in the year ,1997 at each station along the Yarqon River. |
| .5 |
The Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority and the Yarqon River Authority do not always examine the same parameters (in Israel, there are no regulations stipulating which parameters must be examined). Therefore, some parameters may be missing in some of the streams. |
| .6 |
Not all of the stations along the stream are presented in the table (e.g., there are 21 stations on the Yarqon, while only 8 are reported in the table). |
| Variables in the table: |
| Y, X - Coordinates of monitoring stations |
| N - Number of repeated measurements at a monitoring station (per year) |
|
EC - Electrical Conductivity, measured in milli-mho units per centimeter (mmho/cm), where the mho is the inverse of the ohm (mho=(-1), |
|
BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand from biological activity, measured by the breakdown of organic material by bacteria, in units of milligram of oxygen per liter (mg/L). |
|
COD - Chemical Oxygen Demand measured by the consumption of oxygen from chemical activity by intensive breakdown and oxidation at high temperatures, measured in milligrams of oxygen per liter (mg/L). |
| Cl - Concentration of chlorides in the water, measured in milligrams of chloride per liter (mg/L). |
| B - Concentration of boron in water, measured in milligrams of boron per liter (mg/L). |
| TSS - Total Suspended Solids, measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L). |
|
Saturation indicates the saturation percent of oxygen in the water. It is calculated as the value of saturated oxygen measured in mg/L divided by the level of solubility, taking into account the temperature and the height. |
|
Mark A mark given by the researchers, representing the state of the water. The mark is based on BOD values. |
|
For every chemical and biological measurement, the table indicates minimum values (MIN) and maximum values (MAX), as well as the coefficient of variation (CV) and the median for repeated measurements at the monitoring station. |
|
The Life Sciences Institute, at the Tel-Aviv University, provided professional assistance and support for construction of the measures and the table. |
| DATA SOURCES |
|
The quality of stream water is monitored regularly by the Nature Reserves Authority at over 100 streams throughout the country. |
|
Streams are sampled at several stations along their bank. The Yarqon River Authority monitors the quality of the Yarqon river water in the same way. In this table, the samples were all taken in 1997 by the Nature Reserves Authority, and in 1996 and 1997 at the Yarqon River (for an explanation, see the section on Limitations of the Data above). The data processing and statistical analyses were conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| GLOBAL RADIATION AND DURATION OF SUNSHINE |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Global radiation is short-wave radiation of the sun, both direct and dispersed, on a horizontal plane from a spatial angle of 2 Precision Spectral Pyranometer model PSP. (The unit of measurement is mega joule per square meter per day (Mjm-2 day-1). |
| Duration of sunshine is measured by a Campbell-Stokes Sunshine Recorder. |
| The unit of measurement is hours, minutes. |
| SOURCE OF DATA |
|
The Meteorological Service prepares data on radiation and sunshine. Some stations have measured radiation as of ,1965 and others began measurements only in .1990 |
|
Global radiation is measured at four stations: Jerusalem (Givat Ram), Bet Dagan, Beer Sheva, and Elat. Sunshine is measured at two stations: Bet Dagan and Jerusalem (Atarot). |
|
For geographical locations and elevations above sea level of stations, see the section on Climate above. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
The average duration of sunshine in 1997 at Bet Dagan and Jerusalem was calculated on the basis of daily data rather than hourly data. The same applies to duration of sunshine in Jerusalem in .1996 |
| WASTE |
| SOLID HOUSEHOLD WASTE (WET AND DRY, NOT SEPARATED) |
| Definition |
|
Household waste includes dry and wet waste, commercial waste, and shavings collected in 264 local authorities (municipalities, local councils, and regional councils) without separation of components. |
|
Imputation of waste quantities for sites in which waste was not weighed: 264 observations of solid household waste (wet and dry) were obtained in cities, local councils, and regional councils. In 130 local authorities collected waste was not weighed and statistical imputation was carried out (49% of the local authorities were imputed). |
|
In addition, in Jerusalem and Haifa the quantities of waste were estimated according to an evaluation based on the general waste quantities in other large cities. |
|
The variable imputed in statistical imputation is: one kilogram of waste per person, per day. In local authorities, where the value of one kilogram of waste per person per day is imputed, an estimate is calculated (according to the total number of persons in the local authority) for the general waste quantity and for tons of waste per day. After imputations have been made for 130 local authorities, and other variables (mentioned above) had been calculated, the variables were grouped into districts and sub-districts. |
|
The statistical imputation carried out according to the Hot-Deck system takes the value of one kilogram per person from a local authority in the same district, for which weighting is available. In each district the authorities were classified according to type of locality and number of persons in each local authority. The imputation takes from the appropriate district the nearest neighbor to the missing value, according to type of locality and number of residents. Information on the depth of the imputation (number of imputed observations in each sub-district) was added to the table. |
|
Components of Domestic Waste (according to data from the Ministry of the Environment, there were about 544,000 tons of recycled waste in ,1998 which constitute about 10% of all domestic waste (including shavings and household waste). |
|
Presently, waste is not separated at most sites. The following components of waste have been found: 29% paper and cardboard, 11% organic matter, 3% plastics, 1% glass, 42% iron metals, 7% noniron metals, and 4% miscellaneous. |
|
In Israel, there are 35 sites for collection of household waste but only 28 of them are approved by Regional Outline Plan .16 About 20 are active and the rest are inactive. The inactive sites were either filled to capacity or closed due to faulty operation, or still at the stages of construction. |
|
Currently only two sites separate and recycle waste in a moving belt system. From this separation, about 30% turn into compost. The estimate of total national recycling (given by the Ministry of the Environment) is about .10% |
|
The size of the approved area (by Regional Outline Plan 16) is about 12,000 dunam. Only about half of the area is actively operating as waste sites. |
|
Seven sites, which absorb about 6,000 tons of household waste per day, are stated to be closed. According to the current estimate, there is a shortage of secured landfill amounting to about 4,000 tons per day. Consequently, excess waste is transferred to unauthorized sites which operate on the basis of a temporary permit. |
| SOURCES OF DATA |
|
Data on quantities of waste in local authorities by months were obtained from the Ministry of the Environment, the Department of Solid Waste. The data were processed and imputed at the Central Bureau of Statistics, Division of Environmental Statistics. |
|
HAZARDOUS WASTE DELIVERED FOR TREATMENT TO THE RAMAT HOVAV SITE, BY METHOD OF TREATMENT AND TYPE OF MATERIAL |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Improperly treated hazardous waste is a source of concern for those dealing with preservation of the countrys environmental quality and natural resources (aquifers, streams, lakes, oceans, air, and land). |
| Hazardous Waste: |
| .1 |
Hazardous waste is characterized by quantities, concentrations, and physical or chemical properties that may cause or contribute significantly toward increased death-rates, diseases, or any other short-term or long-term (irreversible) damage to the health of individuals or environment if it is not treated, stored, disposed of, or moved in an appropriate way. |
| .2 |
Hazardous waste is any type of material that contains a hazardous substance (based on documented regulations) with an UN identification number, or a substance which belongs to one of the risk groups according to the Orange Book of the United Nations. |
|
Reuse: Hazardous waste that does not undergo a chemical or physical process and is used again in its existing form. |
|
Reclamation and Recycling: Hazardous waste that undergoes a chemical and/or physical process that changes its form so that it can be used again. |
|
Treatment outside of Ramat Hovav: Hazardous waste that has been granted a special permit by the Ministry of the Environment for treatment in a different process (in a plant or elsewhere) outside of Ramat Hovav |
| Methods of Treating Hazardous Waste at the Ramat Hovav Site: |
|
Neutralization: A treatment process based on neutralizing acids with an appropriate alkaline, and vice versa. |
|
Detoxification: A processes aimed at eliminating or reducing the toxic content of inorganic waste including oxidation, hydrogenation, neutralization, and sedimentation of toxic insoluble salts. |
| In both the above methods the generated waste, after the treatment, flows into evaporation ponds. |
|
Secured Landfill: Solid, inorganic, and non-evaporable materials are buried in a secured landfill. The landfill is impermeable, like the evaporation ponds used for neutralization and detoxification in accordance with the regulations of the American EPA. |
|
Incineration: A thermal decomposition of organic waste. This is the accepted and most efficient method of neutralizing hazardous organic waste. The incineration process prevents emission of toxic gases to the atmosphere since purification systems are an integral part of the mechanism. |
|
Other Treatments: The main treatment in this category is solidification. This type of treatment converts hazardous waste into an inert solid (insoluble and not chemically active). |
| Provisions for Treatment of Waste |
|
Treatment of hazardous waste is established in the Regulations for Licensing of Businesses, (removal of hazardous substances waste) - 1990. The regulations stipulate the following: |
| (a) |
Owner of an enterprise shall remove all waste, which originates or exists in the plant. This shall be done as early as possible - no later than six months after the date it is produced. The waste shall be brought to the site for neutralization and treatment of industrial waste and waste of hazardous substances at Ramat Hovav (hereinafter - the toxic waste site). It shall be packed and transported in accordance with legal regulations and subject to the instructions of the authorities. |
| (b) |
An enterprise owner shall not remove the waste from his plant by himself and shall refuse to allow anyone else to remove it by any means or to transport it to any location that is not specified in those regulations - unless removal is for the purpose of recycling, repeated use, or any other purpose - as long as the authorities have given their permission in advance. |
|
The hazardous waste reported in the table refers to the waste brought to the Ramat Hovav site. To date, this site is the only enterprise in Israel that deals, through various methods, with removal of waste that is hazardous to humans and the environment. |
|
The hazardous waste site at Ramat Hovav is not authorized to treat radioactive, explosive, or pathogenic waste (bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms). |
|
Some of the waste that is not brought to Ramat Hovav site is recycled or treated at the industrial plants themselves, e.g., recycling hazardous waste for use at other industries that can make secondary use of it; or reclamation. recycling or other treatment outside of Ramat Hovav. All of these procedures must be authorized in advance according to standards (Section b). Data on this activity (outside of Ramat Hovav) for 1998 were provided to the Central Bureau of Statistics by the Information Center on Hazardous Substances at the Ministry of the Environment. The amount of irregular activity is estimated at 155,000 tones of hazardous waste that does not reach Ramat Hovav. Of this amount, about half of the waste is channeled for treatment outside of the Ramat Hovav site, one-fourth is channeled for reuse, and one-fourth for reclamation and recycling. In ,1998 500 factories removed hazardous waste to Ramat Hovav (an increase of 255 factories compared with 1997). Even though the number of factories that use the plant has increased substantially, about 50,000 tons of hazardous waste are still treated according to other methods. This rate has remained stable for several years. Most of the waste (59%) is from the Southern District, 16% is from the Haifa District, 12% from the Northern District, 8% from the Central District, 3% from the Jerusalem District, and 3% from the Tel Aviv District. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA AND CLASSIFICATION |
| .1 |
The hazardous material at Ramat Hovav is classified into 20 permanent categories. In the statistical table, the following were combined: batteries and accumulators; waste water and alkaline; hydrazide waste and cotnion; and PCB and PCB oil. |
| .2 |
Whenever the raw material data had a quantity value indicating number of units rather than tons (mainly for cytotoxic waste), the conversion factor (from units to tons) which we used is: 1 unit equals 0.128 tons. |
| SOURCE OF DATA |
|
The raw data was obtained from the Environmental Services Company (Ramat Hovav) Ltd. A breakdown of the amounts of hazardous waste that was treated outside of Ramat Hovav was obtained from the Ministry of the Environment and is available at the Central Bureau of Statistics. The raw material was processed and analyzed at the Central Bureau of Statistics. |
| LAND USE, PLANTS AND ANIMALS |
| THE NUMBER OF VISITORS TO NATURE RESERVES AND NATIONAL PARKS |
|
In Israel, there are 155 recognized nature reserves and 41 declared national parks. In about 21 nature reserves and 41 national parks, monitored entry is permitted for an entrance fee set according to the type of population visiting. |
| The overall area of nature reserves and national parks is about six million dunam. |
| DEFINITIONS |
|
Nature Reserves: Areas designated by the government for the purpose of preserving animals, plants, or both. Nature reserves protect natural resources (source: Encyclopedia Britannica, .1998 Entry: Nature Reserve). |
|
National Park: Areas designated by the government for the purpose of preserving the environment. A national park can exist for public activity or out of historical or scientific interest (source: Encyclopedia Britannica, ,1998 Entry: National Park). |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
Since calculation of the number of visitors is based on counts of the different types of tickets sold at nature reserves and national parks, the information is obtained only for sites that require an entrance fee. |
| SOURCES AND METHODS OF CALCULATION |
| The raw data were obtained from the Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority. |
| The Central Bureau of Statistics conducted processing and analysis of the raw data. |
|
The information was compiled by quarters and years and by nature reserves and parks in the most visited sites. The rest of the parks and reserves (which require an entrance fee) were grouped together. |
| ANIMALS |
| WATER FOWL CENSUS |
| Yearly censuses of water fowl have been carried out in Israel for the past 30 years as of .1965 |
|
The census, which is part of an international project, is organized by the Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority, and conducted by the staff and numerous volunteers. The census takes cover a broad range of water sources in Israel lakes, reservoirs, natural pools, and artificial pools on the same date during the Winter season (usually in mid-January). On that day, they count the population of waterfowl. The distribution and density of the fowl are indicative of the state of the water sources in Israel and their spatial distribution. |
|
The data are processed and analyzed every year by the Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority. The Statistical Abstract of the Central Bureau of Statistics presents the results of the censuses, by geographic regions. |
| DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS |
|
Water Fowl: Fowl that subsist in or around a water source. These fowl consist of groups including ducks, herons, pelicans, etc. These fowl subsist in water, by trapping fish, by sifting the water and removing microorganisms, or by finding plants or animals around the water source. |
| LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA |
|
The census counts fowl from all water of the known land water sources, except those that are inaccessible at the time the count is taken. |
| SOURCES OF THE DATA |
|
The information on water fowl is sent to the Central Bureau of Statistics by the Nature Reserves and National Parks Authority. It was prepared for publication by the Central Bureau of Statistics, Division of Environmental Statistics. |
| FOREST AREA, BY SPECIES |
| See the table in the chapter on Agriculture. |
| SELECTED PUBLICATIONS |
| TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS |
| 70 |
List of Localities, Their Population and Codes 31 XII 1998 |
| CURRENT BRIEFINGS IN STATISTICS |
| ,35 1996 |
Survey of Waste Water, 1994 |
| ,37 1997 |
Expenditure on Public Services for Environmental Protection, 1993 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |